Way to go Bob!!
To answer your question, the usual answer you would give is "if it was good
enough for GM engineers ... " But, I think if you are going to give it a lot of
road time the sealed beams would be a great advantage. I never thought I would
hear you say should I "stay stock?"
All The Best!
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
George La Fountaine
Granada Hills, CA
Restoring Grandpa's 1954 Chevy 3104
glafountaine@socal.rr.com
----- Original Message -----
From: <Advdesign1@aol.com>
To: <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2000 3:35 AM
Subject: [oletrucks] New Arrival
> I'm the proud father of a 1938 suburban carryall. It is totally stock,
> minimal rust for NY, engine stuck, trans stuck, needs door bottoms and
> quarter bottoms, but I'm falling in love with it. Has not been on the road
> since about 1955. Has all seats, good fenders, good tail and lift gate, good
> running boards. ALL windows go up and down. Original paint faded to primer
> and surface rust, but pinstriping visible. Now I need a few months of spare
> time. Needless to say, This is a rare find. I had been running a 1966
> panel truck for the past 22 years and it is rotted out bad and ready for
> retirement before it falls apart. My question is should I convert to sealed
> beam headlamps or stay stock? The 216 is adequate for me.
> Bob ADler
> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
|