oletrucks
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [oletrucks] 216 engine performance questions - babbiting process

To: jrdorsey@strato.net, oletrucks@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [oletrucks] 216 engine performance questions - babbiting process
From: Passnb4U@aol.com
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 19:29:14 EDT
   Still a pricy expenditure.  last I checked for babbiting on my old Dodge, 
it was $70.00 a main and $40.00 a rod.

  Mike

In a message dated 7/23/99 4:01:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
jrdorsey@strato.net writes:

<< I don't know about the 216s but the dipper 235s had insert main bearings
 and poured rod bearings. 
 
 John
 3800 panel
 > 
 > Babbiting is not something most people would take on at home. The main
 > bearings and caps are poured separately, I believe. It wouldn't be
 > impossible to pour both at the same time. Babbit melts somewhere below 900
 > degrees. According to the Model A people (a friend has one), the babbit to
 > use is 4X nickel based babbit. Don't use lead based babbit. The con rods 
are
 > poured in a way similar to the mains. A mold has to be made up to hold the
 > babbit in place until it cools. Then the main caps are bolted on and the
 > block is line bored. Rods are also bored to size. Babbiting is labor
 > intensive and not very practical. The place that rebuilt my friend's engine
 > charges the same to pour new babbit or convert to inserts. You are right
 > about the shimming. I would think the 216 rods and probably the block would
 > have to be machined to take insert >>
oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>