To: | LSelz@aol.com, lambroving@worldnet.att.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Car & Driver |
From: | ARoman4047@aol.com |
Date: | Tue, 11 May 1999 07:39:16 EDT |
Gentlepersons: If the Car & Driver article is accurate, then it is indeed unfortunate that this "new" Morgan is the future of Malvern...This best/worst of high tech com- bined with nostalgic touches (an ash dash board cover for the air bag?), seems to be driven by outside forces- i.e. legislation compliance. I'm still unfamiliar with Lawrence's track record- other than what is mentioned in the various Morgan "puff" books- Perhaps Greg Solow or someone else is better informed? But the article implies that this partnership between MMC and Lawrence is perhaps more charity-driven than it should/could be. The bottom line is that it is the Morgan family's business and despite all the PR about the "bespoke" relationship between owner and "the works"...some- one is driving a Ferrari paid for by consumers and would like to continue driving it. Carp about the changes, all you/we/I want... As far as the safety regs go---remember the self-immolating Pinto? Tiger Paws in the rain? etc. There's a thin line here between responsibility and liability that's been exploited by both sides in any legislative discussion. Ideally, most of us want a good-looking/handling/easily serviced vehicle that turns itself into a survivable Volvo-type .5 seconds before the other idiot driver creams us. John Muir, lo these many years ago, came up with the ultimate safety feature- Put the driver in front of the bumper and see if accident numbers go down... Tony in NJ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Rhinemog, Jhalfdime |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Morgan Driving Averages, Lorne Goldman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Car & Driver, LSelz |
Next by Thread: | Re: Car & Driver, Bob Nogueira |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |