--- Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Well, it seems like a lot for a car that has been hit front and
> back, and "repaired" so that you can still tell it was damaged!
> Why bother repairing it at all?? It really depends on how much
> bodywork it really needs. And since there is no 'frame', I'm not
> sure what he refers to in saying that 'the frame is good'. OTOH, a
> running C with no rust isn't a common proposition, so $6,000 may
> not be a bad deal.
So, what's a realistic price for a '68 - '70 vintage MGC
"convertible" in decent drivable unrestored condition
(typical "patina" and a few little dings and dents)? This
is a car I've always wanted to get, and I might be in a
position to start looking for one by next year.
David Breneman david_breneman@yahoo.com
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
|