mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: When "Classic" really meant "Classic"...

To: MG List <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: When "Classic" really meant "Classic"...
From: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 14:00:55 -0700
Good job, Skye. I have always found that source a little frustrating,
however, in that there is no full road test data for a 5-main-bearing,
3-synchro roadster, which "should" post the best numbers on the chart. Note
that the 66 GT shows the highest HP rating -- a 66 roadster would have the
same engine (obviously), but post better 0-60 and 1/4 mile times (being
lighter). Extrapolating its lbs/hp as 24.5, I think it would break 12
seconds easily in the 0-60.

As fellow 66 owners we both have a stake in this issue <g>...


on 9/23/02 12:52 PM, Skye Poier at skye@ffwd.cx wrote:

> Not pre-1960, but I just entered a bunch of performance data last night:
> 
> http://www.mgbexperience.com/reference/specification.html#performance
> 
> Skye
> 
>>> Does anyone know of a source to get actual road tests of
>>> older cars especially pre 1960?  Once in a while I like to
>>> do some real comparison, not subjective.
>>> 
>>> Blake
> 
> --
> 1966 MGB - GHN3L     Safety Fast!             __,__\__
> The MGB Experience   www.mgbexperience.com   (_o____o_)
> 


--

Max Heim
'66 MGB GHN3L76149
If you're near Mountain View, CA,
it's the primer red one with chrome wires

///  or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>