If you use microsoft products you expose yourself to a greater risk.
Thats a fact. Whether its NT or Outlook. If you want to reduce
your exposure don't use Microsoft products. You are free to
continue to use a defective product if you wish, however.
Several Gov't agencies have droped Microsoft NT because of
its lack of security.
If you use a paperclip to lock the front door of your house
don't blame the burgler who visits you. You could
have used a better product such as a padlock.
"Kai M. Radicke" wrote:
> Blaming Microsoft's products for user ignorance? Just because Microsoft
> Outlook products are the predominant email software for the vast majority of
> internet users, does not excuse the fact that each and every one of these
> viruses that have affected Microsoft Outlook had to be user initiated! By
> that I mean, the user opened and viewed the attachment at his or her will.
>
> Viruses (and more specifically virus writers) will always be finding ways to
> exploit the most popular software, if they didn't exploit the most popular
> software it would defeat the purpose of writing a replicating virus to begin
> with.
>
> Yes there are security issues with Outlook, but none that which are so fatal
> and lethal that user awareness can not stop them. User awareness is the
> issue here, not just Microsoft's poor security practices.
>
> Kai (internet user since 1994, one virus ever, using Microsoft Outlook
> Express since 1998 on Microsoft Windows and the Sun Solaris operating
> system)
///
/// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list
/// (If they are dupes, this trailer may also catch them.)
|