"Kai M. Radicke" wrote:
> Secondly, yes most MGB/Midget owners ARE cheap.
> The vast majority of MGB/Midget owners do not have thier MGBs restored
> properly by a reputable restoration shop for $25k. This is where the matter
> is complicated again. If an MGB was worth $25k after restoration, at least
> the cost could be justified. So what happens? Mediocre cars are purchased,
> half-assed repairs done, using bodged parts in an effort to achieve a nice
> car worth more than what one has put into it. This is the same reason
> MGB/Midget owners are so keen on used parts, CHEAP -- CHEAPER -- CHEAPEST!
Much was cut out of the above - both before and after it.
Here is what I have to say to you Kai (and I am an early MGB owner that has
spent
way more then the car is worth on it - for those of you that don't know me - Kai
does know me somewhat):
So, why did you buy a Triumph rather than that 911 you were looking to buy. I
don't know for sure, but my guess is CHEAP
By the way guys, I do like Kai - but he deserves a little ribbing for this one.
Guy with a '58 MGA, a '67 MGB and a 1969 Porsche 911. Guess what, the MGA and
the MGB are both Cheaper than the Porsche, but the B still needs some
restoration
work, and the porsche doesn't anymore. I bought the A in pretty good shape.
Phil Bates
///
/// mgs@autox.team.net mailing list
/// (If they are dupes, this trailer may also catch them.)
|