mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Pertronix vs Mallory Magnetic

To: "Andrew B. Lundgren" <lundgren@byu.net>
Subject: RE: Pertronix vs Mallory Magnetic
From: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 12:27:15 -0700
Grassroots Motorsports, a magazine.

http://www.grmotorsports.com/

Larry Hoy

>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-mgs@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-mgs@autox.team.net]On
>Behalf Of Andrew B. Lundgren
>Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 11:48 AM
>To: Brinkman, Gerardo V
>Cc: The MG List
>Subject: Re: Pertronix vs Mallory Magnetic
>
>
>What is Grassroots?
>
>On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Brinkman, Gerardo V wrote:
>
>> >Have been investigating switching my ignition system over to a breakerless
>> >setup for my 74 V8. I'm intending on using a Mallory ignition control. To
>> do
>> >this it appears I will need to replace my Dual point distributor with
>> either
>> >a Mallory Magnetic distributor ($320) or a Pertronix device which will
>> >require me to lock out the mechanical advance. It costs $110. A big
>> >difference! Anybody with practical experience tell me whether or not there
>> >is any difference worth the extra $. Oh, I also don't want to lose the
>> >vacumn advance in the distributor - anyone know if the Pertronix affects
>> >this?
>> 
>> There is a great article in this month's Grassroots, where they take a
>> regular
>> MGBGT and put it on a dyno. Then they add "external" performance pieces to
>> the engine and measure it again.
>> 
>> Reprint from GRM:
>> Basleine                     56.8hp
>> Add Petronix                 61.1hp
>> Add MSD                      62.7hp
>> Wires                                62.7hp
>> Petronix/MSD +30deg advance  64.3hp
>> As above with K&N            65.9hp (+16% increase over baseline)
>> 
>> .
>> 
>> this is an ongoing exercise, and in the next issues they are going to make
>> more mods.
>> 
>> gerry

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>