mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Why unibody?

To: "mgs@autox.team.net" <mgs@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Why unibody?
From: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 08:40:35 -0800
Well, it was the wave of the future, circa 1960. Sunbeam's Alpine was 
already on the road with a unibody. MG couldn't be left behind (or so 
they thought).

Of course, the advantages are all at the manufacturing end -- ease of 
restoration 30-40 years later didn't enter into it.

Just be glad they didn't use wood -- you can't patch and weld dry rot...

: )

Tim Nagy had this to say:

>Here's one I haven't seen...why did MG decide on a unibody versus a
>traditional chassis.
>
>I'm sorry if this is one of those "obvious things that every MG owner
>should know", but I just thought it would be alot easier to do the body
>work (sills) if it weren't structural.
>
>Well, flame suit on, if necessary.
>
>Tim
>


--

Max Heim
'66 MGB GHN3L76149
If you're near Mountain View, CA,
it's the red one with the silver bootlid.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>