To: | "mgs@autox.team.net" <mgs@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Why unibody? |
From: | Tim Nagy <nagyt@stargate.duq.edu> |
Date: | Tue, 21 Dec 1999 22:46:24 -0500 |
Here's one I haven't seen...why did MG decide on a unibody versus a traditional chassis. I'm sorry if this is one of those "obvious things that every MG owner should know", but I just thought it would be alot easier to do the body work (sills) if it weren't structural. Well, flame suit on, if necessary. Tim |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Timeout - lister(s) near Hopkinton, Carl French |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: o/d & odo, Tab Julius |
Previous by Thread: | OD's and speedos, Jack Emery |
Next by Thread: | Re: Why unibody?, Barney Gaylord |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |