I'm glad some one speaks out. I was begining to wonder if any one really
thought it through.
Thanks for restoring my faith.
Tom Emmons
tom@emmons.com
http://www.tom.emmons.com
1978 MGB
----------
From: Rick Morrison[SMTP:gofastmg@juno.com]
Sent: Friday, January 01, 1999 7:54 PM
To: CIAG6@aol.com
Cc: macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu; Lawrie@britcars.com; boballen@sky.net;
mgs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Millennium bug was: Cold weather starting -- The Drill
On Fri, 1 Jan 1999 16:13:29 EST CIAG6@aol.com writes:
>In a message dated 99-01-01 13:07:16 EST,
>macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu
>writes:
>
><< Lawrie, et al
> the millennium does not start for 1 MORE Year!!.
> It will not be the 21st Century until 1/1/2001. not 1/1/2000. The
>20th
> Century did not start until 1/1/1901. Or do we have just 99 years
>this
> Century??
>
> The popular press keeps getting this wrong.
> Larry Macy
> 78 Midget >>
> Oh, really? You are assuming that the year number refers to the
>number of
>years that have been completed. It actually refers to the year that
>we are
>in. Yes, the 2000th year will begin in the year 2000.
>
And at the end of that 2000th year we will begin the next century.
1/12000 will be the LAST year of this century.
For the century to start on 1/1/2000, the first year would have had to
been year "0". There was no such year.
Rick Morrison
72 MGBGT
74 Midget
|