Not sure what I stirred up here. I am not a physicist, and perhaps "fact"
was too strong a word.
All I'm saying is why pump this stuff into the atmosphere when you can have
it captured & reused?
If the guys who say it's a "Bad Thing" are correct, you do a "Good Thing" by
capturing it.
If they're wrong, no harm done.
Didn't mean to ruffle anybody's feathers.
Jim
-----Original Message-----
From: john peloquin <peloquin@galaxy.ucr.edu>
To: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>
Cc: mgs@autox.team.net <mgs@autox.team.net>
Date: Friday, June 12, 1998 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: A/C certification...
>Dear Max,
>
>and other netters,
>
>Previous argument and questions were removed:
>
>
>I think the questions brought up here are relevant and I'd like to hear
>some answers to them. BTW, not ALL NASA and atmospheric scientists are
>completely convinced.
>
>I'm not saying that it's ok to release R12 or that the phasing out of R12
>etc. was a bad idea, I'm saying that the verdict isn't in regarding the
>exact causes of either the "Ozone hole" OR "global warming".
>
>Also, when someone presents questions regarding an hypothesis, people that
>support the hypothesis in question generally attempt to answer the
>questions, unless they are unfamiliar with the data supporting the
>hypothesis. In that event, they are taking their position of support for
>the hypothesis on Faith, not Reason.
>
>"Never Ascribe to Malice that which can be explained by Ignorance."
>John J. Peloquin
>Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
>
|