mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Range vs. Land and Rover, the Truth form a know-nothing

To: padre@billman.kuntrynet.com
Subject: Re: Range vs. Land and Rover, the Truth form a know-nothing
From: miker15@juno.com
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 00:19:13 EST
On Fri, 20 Mar 1998 21:50:15 -0800 Philip Morgan
<padre@billman.kuntrynet.com> writes:

>Essentially - The Land Rover is the British response to the Jeep, only 
>a 
>lot better! The basic Jeep then equates to your basic Land Rover, 
>whilst 
>the top of the line Jeep Cherokee would equate to the Range Rover.
>
>Regards Philip
>
Actually its a "chicken and egg" thing -not really a "response" since the
Range Rover was introduced in 1969 and remained essentially unchanged
until its facelift in 1993, the same year jeep facelifted the
Cherokee/Wagoneer - they now look surprisingly similar (but then so do
Nissans/Toyotas and whatnot in their various groups)
Hate to say it but having owned a jeep since 93, I compared the Range
Rover in 96 and .......got another jeep

mike robson
69 roadster
70 BGT
72 roadster



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>