mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Fuel guage sender ohms, second try -Reply

To: Matt.Kulka@hboc.com
Subject: RE: Fuel guage sender ohms, second try -Reply
From: "Scott Gardner" <gardner7@pilot.infi.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 1998 22:23:19 +0000
> I read an article a while ago in Car & Driver that explained that fuel
> gauges are built intentionally inaccurate.  In a modern American car,
> the gauge will read full until the tank is a few gallons low.  The gauge
> will read empty when there are a few gallons left in the tank.
> 
<<SNIP>>
> >>> Douglas Gaither <gaither@ix.netcom.com> 01/12/98 03:41pm >>>

Douglas,
        I'm not positive, but I thought that there was actually a fixed 
number of gallons that HAD to be in the tank when the needle read 
"empty", courtesy of Ralph Nader, et al.  It was really a pain in the 
ass on my old Prelude (~12 gallon tank), because I think mine had 
something like 2.5 gallons left when it read empty, which was a 
quarter-tank.  I wish that they would just make the gauge accurate, 
and leave the risk-taking to us.
        On a related topic, I think there may be some inherent inaccuracy in 
gas gauges.  My brother's BMW had the 1/4-tank marks spaced unevenly 
along the face of the gauge, but they were accurate.  Perhaps this 
was to compensate for problems with the gauge?
Scott

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>