mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: California...

To: John McEwen <mmcewen@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>
Subject: Re: California...
From: "Richard Fontaine (ENG)" <fontaine@scooby.lklnd.usf.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 16:34:42 -0500 (EST)
group;
we get heavy "aluminum overcast" in florida,even on the 2 lane rds..the
good news is that you can pass them in a cloud of dust with a 4 banger tc!
dick fontaine
48mgtc
62tr3b
"if it aint steel, it aint real"


On Thu, 23 Jan 1997, John McEwen wrote:

> Dear Dick, Ray, and List:
> 
> I have driven both coastal roads - CA and OR - and thought the roads were
> great.  However, the scenery was monotonous.  I have never seen so much
> painted aluminum and fiberglass in my life.  All of it was, of course,
> attached to the motor homes, fifth wheels, travel trailers, tent trailers
> and van conversions which solidly plug the highway during any seasonal
> moment.  Driving such a highway during the top down portion of the year is
> a monument to 2-lane frustration coupled with moments of sheer terror when
> frustration leads to desperate moves.
> 
> I think I'd rather drive on I-5.
> 
> John McEwen
> 
> PS -  The Coastal Highway is equalled by the appalling conditions on the
> Trans Canada Highway through British Columbia.  Travel between Banff and
> Kamloops during July or August can reduce one to tears of frustration.
> It's time we carefully examined the cost of building truck/RV roads or that
> we limit truck/RV traffic to certain hours or days of the week.  BTW, I own
> a large camping trailer and van.  I recognize that I contribute to the
> problem but I would be willing to pay for more and better roads and/or
> restrictions on certain types of vehicles.  We have no idea of the
> unbelievable cost of heavy truck damage to our roads.  We have no one but
> ourselves to blame for letting the trucking industry destroy the railroads
> which were designed to do the job.
> 
> JM
> 
> 
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>