5.They're more fun than a barrel of monkey's.
6. Bigger bang for you driving pleasure buck.
my.02
George curl
On Mon, 23 Sep 1996, Ken Boetzer wrote:
>
> > To All,
> >
> > Since purchasing my first MGB as a restoration project last year I've
> > heard quite a few comments on the quality of British cars (...flow
> > through oil systems, etc., etc.). My question is, what really are the
> > weak spots in the design and construction of British cars? Is it
> > material quality? Poor design? Also, are there any parts that can be
> > replaced with newer, improved parts? I would really like to hear a
> > discussion of this.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > David Macedonia [edm107@psu.edu]
> > Boalsburg, PA.
> > 1966 MGB
> >
>
> David,
>
> Let's make this more managable by discussing the strengths of the British
>designs.
>
> 1) They look really nifty.
> 2) They often have a removable/replaceable top.
> 3) They often hold two people comfortably.
> 4) When they run well, they sound really nifty, and feel great to drive or
>ride in.
> .
> .
> .
> .
> ? Anyone have anything else to add?
>
> ;-)
>
> Ken Boetzer
>
|