To: | mgb-v8@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Roller Lifters |
From: | "James J." <m1garand@speakeasy.net> |
Date: | Fri, 07 Nov 2003 23:33:38 -0500 |
Cc: | James Nazarian <jhn3@uakron.edu>, "T. S. White" <tswrace@pacbell.net> |
In-reply-to: | <001901c3a5ad$34f67c40$4c066582@TPT> |
References: | <5.2.1.1.0.20031105174832.00aa09d0@mail.look.ca> <3FAA8B77.000008.02584@james-jewell.ipo.gov> <3FABCE29.1C3842E9@pacbell.net> <001901c3a5ad$34f67c40$4c066582@TPT> |
Reply-to: | "James J." <m1garand@speakeasy.net> |
Sender: | owner-mgb-v8@autox.team.net |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) |
A roller-cam is typically more agressive, with regards to rise and fall
time. I believe that a roller-lifter could easily work on a less
agressive profile (stock cam), for the same reason a highly tuned
autocross car can easily drive on the interstate highway system as well
as a lazy Lincoln or Caddy can, but the reverse is not true. Because
the bottom of a roller lifter is radiused (and rolls) it can approach a
steep slope with aplomb, but nothing prevents it from also traversing a
cam that is worn to the point of being nearly flat. A flat tappet is
far more limited in the profile of cam it can approach. A lobe that a
roller could glide over could conceivably slam into the side of a
conventional lifter and sieze up the entire valvetrain. So part of my original question was: Since a roller lifter can handle a normal cam, does the reduced friction of a roller lifter offer any performance/durability gains over a regular lifter on the same cam? If it frees up another 10 HP, or allows me another 30K miles before a regrind, for example, I may look into developing the idea further. It's well established that roller rockers free up a few ponies and increase the life of the valvetrain, and they only introduce friction during one stroke of the 4-stroke cycle. Cam lifters are constantly intruducing friction as the cam is always rotating underneath them, and I believe the contact patch is much larger, so it seams like an area for investigation. Then again the oil-film on the cam lobes could reduce friction to levels below what the rocker tips generate moving across the valve stem, if that area has worse lubrication. I honestly don't know, which is why I was asking. Perhaps Detroit concluded that it didn't, or that it did, but wasn't cost effective. JJJ /// /// mgb-v8@autox.team.net mailing list /// Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net /// Send list postings to mgb-v8@autox.team.net /// Edit your replies! If they include this trailer, they will NOT be sent. /// |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Roller Lifters, James Nazarian |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Roller Lifters, Jack Emery |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Roller Lifters, James Nazarian |
Next by Thread: | Re: Roller Lifters, Jack Emery |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |