To: | "Bryan Savage" <b.a.savage@wildblue.net>, "Benn" |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: E85, more questions |
From: | "Rich Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com> |
Date: | Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:25:32 -0700 |
One thing we do have is coal. Most of these alternate fuels are merely a way to turn coal into something that can be used in cars. You could burn coal, generate electricity, use that to make Hydrogen. Of distill lots of corn or other starch. I don't know what that would do for the air, but someday oil will get to expensive no mater if it's diesel or gasoline. By then we will be getting serious about new fuels. I have seen pictures of the coal turbine that I thing Union Pacific built and pulled trains with. Way to much carbon build up. Rich Fox ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bryan Savage" <b.a.savage@wildblue.net> To: "Benn" <karhu@california.com> Cc: <land-speed@autox.team.net> Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 1:43 PM Subject: Re: E85, more questions > BINGO !! > > Benn is right on target Ed. > We have E85 because the "farmer" (think Archer Daniels Midland) makes > a bunch of money from it. > If you have a Rain Forrest to burn distilling the stuff (Brazil) it is > cheaper > than oil. > There are a group of noisy people calling themselves "environmentalists", > who don't know Junk Science from a Zip Code, that also support it. > > Bryan |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: E85, more questions, Bryan Savage |
---|---|
Next by Date: | E85, more questions, some answers...., Benn |
Previous by Thread: | Re: E85, more questions, Bryan Savage |
Next by Thread: | Re: E85, more questions, Rich Fox |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |