To: | "Sparky" <wmtsmith@landracing.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: E85, more questions |
From: | "Ed Weldon" <23.weldon@comcast.net> |
Date: | Thu, 8 Jun 2006 08:31:16 -0700 |
High octane rating is interesting.........we don't talk much anymore about compression ratios. But I seem to remember many years ago when suffering through a thermodynamics course a mention about better theoretical efficiency at higher compression ratios. Better efficiency translates to better mileage. We all never paid much heed to the mileage thing when all we could think of was getting more hp out of our engines on 30 cents/gallon gas. I do recall in the 60's when you could buy 100+ octane gas some of the small block powered cars, and we're talking cars weighing 3800-4000 lbs dry, had no trouble getting 20-25 mpg on the highway. I guess the nitrogen compound emission problem killed high compression ratios; but I wonder if modern emission control technology is able to overcome that. I suppose it can; since we have turbocharged engines that operate at high compression pressures. Or is there some ignored loophole in the emision regulations that allow for the relatively infrequent use of high power output conditions in turbocharged passenger car engines? For example do the treadmill smog tests now used in CA get the power output anywhere near high enough to get a turbo really working? ....I wonder. Ed Weldon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sparky" <wmtsmith@landracing.com> Subject: Re: E85, more questions > by putting 15% gas in it---........it's octane rating is 105-108 but it takes 15-20% more volume to produce the same power............... |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: E85, more questions, Adin, David |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: E85, more questions, James Tone |
Previous by Thread: | RE: E85, more questions, Adin, David |
Next by Thread: | Re: E85, more questions, James Tone |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |