To: | "Dick J" <lsr_man@yahoo.com>, |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Engine Mounts - Rubber or Solid |
From: | "Tom Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com> |
Date: | Fri, 12 May 2006 09:54:33 -0700 |
Dick, I have run rubber mounts, but the engine and transmission are now bolted directly to the frame. I don't see any advantage to rubber mounts except a little less vibration throughout the car. Bolting solid eliminates one more "weak link". I certainly would not mix types of mounts. It makes good sense to use rubber for engine and trans or solid for both. Tom, Redding CA - #216 D/FCC |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: Early Morning Breakfast Dyno Report, Tom Bryant |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: The Dyno Report.., Ed Van Scoy |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Engine Mounts - Rubber or Solid, Benn |
Next by Thread: | RE: Engine Mounts - Rubber or Solid, Ed Weldon |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |