"with a shorter vehicle, it can be surmised that
the air is likely "less" attached, how would one
think that they could now "direct" that less attached
air at a more aggressive degree??"
Especially when you do the math and see the overall length necessary to
facilitate never exceeding 6 degrees. The catch 22 is more surface area by
sticking with the formula, or possibly drag inducing air turbulance by
abreviating
the body. That's what makes this interesting, me thinks.
On a less heady vein, I nominate Keith Turk for "thread of the Year" for the
1st car question !
Webmaster, send him a T-shirt !.........Bob W
|