it becomes exceedingly imperative to ensure
proper balance as bores become looser
and out of round, usually improper deck heights
"clearance" themselves, which is great, as long
as the "rod" doesnt get bent, the tightest "squish"
clearance yields the best "bang" for the buck,
unless you plan on being "blown", then abit less
compression usually goes along way to repeatability/durability,.........
then we get into the discussion of intake tract smoothness vs
turbulance..........
Joe (I will be home early this week) Amo :)
Quoting Joe & Lynne Lance <jolylance@earthlink.net>:
> Joe
> What kind of crank are you talking about? Never thought about getting mine
> balanced---does it have something to do with the deck height?
>
> lance
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <jkamo@rushmore.com>
> To: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>
> Cc: "Rick Yacoucci" <turborick@TurboRick.com>; <land-speed@Autox.Team.Net>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 4:19 PM
> Subject: RE: Crank Balancing ( Math )
>
>
> > thats simple..........
> >
> > its an American principle...........
> >
> > "more is better...and too much is just enough".........
> >
> > you know, they thought they might break into that
> > Harley demographic, more rocking moments/couplings
> >
> > biggy size me, cuz I dont want an ordinary coronary
> > I want one that takes me completely out type of rationale
> >
> > I still strive for the more is better principle at home..........
> >
> > thats when I learned about being careful what you wish for.......
> >
> > "no I dont think a size 12 is better than a size 8"
> >
> > Joe
>
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent by http://webmail.rushmore.com
|