Re: Traction Control

[Bob Denton <foxriverkid@earthlink.net>]

That would be some fabulous classes They could referred to as $G and $F. 
You might want to break it up into "sponsored" money and "own" money 
since money would be the true determining factor.

Bob D.

Dave Dahlgren wrote:

>I still vote for the class that has three rules .. So that it would be "at the
>pinnacle of the straightaway racers art" and "innovation is unlimited"  page 42
>section 5A 2003 rule book... They sound nice but don't mean what they say..
>Innovation is regulated and has nothing to do with unlimited.. No different 
>than
>Nascar or SCCA.. Innovation is just as regulated in those organizations that i
>thought we had nothing to do with. I can't be about money because it only costs
>350 more than the regular MSD.. about the same as the entry fee. You buy the 
>MSD
>once and the entry fee one or more times per year. Defiantly less the the hotel
>costs for speed week. WE have a classic category for all the 'retro rides' why
>not make all the non classic cars at least in special construction be what the
>rule book promises?
>
>the 3 required rules..
>engine size
>fuel
>number of wheels
>
>Dave
>
>Dan Warner wrote:
>  
>
>>SCTA rule book Page 19 Sec 2.Q regarding computers.
>>Dan Warner comments??
>>*********************************
>>Still illegal for our use. If you are caught using traction control severe
>>penalties are in place.
>>
>>We have complied an extensive list of products claiming traction control
>>capabilities. We have discuseed banning the use of the MSD 7531 igintion box.
>>The person writing the article has his facts slightly wrong as tc was to be
>>banned 1/2 way through this F1 season. TC is out of CART now that that series
>>has become a spec engine deal.
>>
>>Dan Warner

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive