Doug
RIGHT ON.
Glen
----- Original Message -----
From: <ARDUNDOUG@aol.com>
To: <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: Data Recorders
> In a message dated 4/17/2002 4:53:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> webmaster@landracing.com writes:
>
>
> > Correct me if I am wrong we are amateur right, NASCAR is not, lets not
> > become what they are. Lets make our own rules.
> > Are we having fun yet?
> >
> > Jonathan Amo
> >
> I have no feelings one way or another on the rule banning data
gathering
> in the new Classic class. However, I see no connection between SCTA-BNI
and
> NASCAR, NHRA, CART, IRL, et.all. SCTA-BNI is a pretty democratic
> organization. Unless I'm badly misteken the rule changes are not just
> dictated by a small nucleus of officers behind closed doors. The inputs
from
> all the participants and members of SCTA are passed on to the Rules
> Committee, which holds meetings open to all association members, at which
> testimony is heard from interested parties. The whole process is done in a
> pretty democratic way. Dan, correct me if I'm wrong.
> My supposition on the data-gathering ban was that because the cars in
> this new class are from an era where computers were not in wide-spread
> automotive use yet, and possibly devices like EFI hadn't been invented or
> perfected yet, the Rules Committee wanted the participants to run this new
> class with the technology that was available when the cars in this new
class
> were built. What other restrictions are there on the new Classic Class?
> I haven't received my 2002 Rule Book yet, but that was the general
line
> of thinking that I recall hearing last year when the class was being
> discussed.......Ardun Doug King
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed
|