Dave
I agree on this one. I think all automated systems including chute releases
should have an manual override.
Glen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
To: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>
Cc: "'Higginbotham Land Speed Racing'" <saltrat@pro-blend.com>;
"landspeedracer" <landspeedracer@msn.com>; <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:17 AM
Subject: Re: Solid suspension and visibility comments
> Wouldn't common sense tell you that if there is a fire than you have to
assume
> the electric stuff is all dead???
> I would have to also believe that a mechanical linkage or actuator would
be
> mandatory for the same reason or if not at least for personal safety...
>
> Dave Dahlgren
>
> "Albaugh, Neil" wrote:
> >
> > The automatic actuation can be through a latching relay; once on it
stays
> > on.
> >
> > Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Higginbotham Land Speed Racing [mailto:saltrat@pro-blend.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:11 PM
> > To: landspeedracer; Albaugh, Neil; land-speed@autox.team.net
> > Subject: Re: Solid suspension and visibility comments
> >
> > And once you activate the switch it will stay on.
> > Skip
> >
> > At 05:24 PM 10/30/01 -0500, landspeedracer wrote:
> > >Remember Guys, with on/off switches or valves, as per the SCTA rule
book:
> > >"The valves shall be designed to remain open once actuated."
> > >
> > >John B.
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Skip Higginbotham" <saltrat@pro-blend.com>
> > >To: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; <land-speed@autox.team.net>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:08 AM
> > >Subject: RE: Solid suspension and visibility comments
> > >
> > >
> > >> Neil,
> > >> The problem with resistance wire systems is false alarms.......not a
good
> > >> idea at 300 MPH +. Too hard on the heart! And IR systems are a little
> > >> pricey for me.
> > >> Auto fire extinguishing is OK if you don't want to control the
> > >extinguisher
> > >> manually. I do. I feel like I can turn on the fire bottles until the
fire
> > >> is out and if I'm not stopped yet, I can turn off the fire bottles
and
> > >save
> > >> the agent for later in the shut-down if the fire relights or was not
out
> > >to
> > >> begin with. Also manual control might let me breathe in the small
> > >> cockpit!!! Too subtile?
> > >> Hard to reason with a fire that is behind you though!!! Auto system
might
> > >> be the best in the long run. I worry about false actuation.......
> > >> Skip
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> At 09:50 AM 10/30/01 -0600, you wrote:
> > >> >Skip;
> > >> >
> > >> >That's a good idea. You could probably wire that into a solenoid-
> > >operated
> > >> >valve to actuate the fire bottles automatically, too.
> > >> >
> > >> >I've seen some aircraft fire detection systems that are based on a
wire
> > >that
> > >> >changes resistance. Some of the newer flame detectors sense
ultraviolet
> > >> >radiation so they aren't confused by IR heat radiation from the
> > >collectors
> > >> >or other hot spots.
> > >> >
> > >> >Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >-----Original Message-----
> > >> >From: Skip Higginbotham [mailto:saltrat@pro-blend.com]
> > >> >Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 5:54 PM
> > >> >To: Albaugh, Neil; land-speed@autox.team.net
> > >> >Subject: RE: Solid suspension and visibility comments
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >Neil,
> > >> >I have a fire detection system in the liner/lakester. Turns a bright
red
> > >> >light on in the cockpit. No false alarms yet.
> > >> >Skip
///
/// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
/// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// with nothing in it but
///
/// unsubscribe land-speed
///
/// or go to http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///
///
|