I can vouch for that living in the Dakotas, many dismounted
remnants abound
Joe (where fenders (panels) are apparently an option too) :)
maybe we here in SD simply like less frontal area, and lakesters
Ed Van Scoy wrote:
> RE: No Fenders on Street Roadsters
>
> The tribal wisdom of the Dakota Indians, passed on from one generation to
> the next, says that when you discover you are riding a dead horse, the best
> strategy is to dismount
> Ed
>
> John Beckett wrote:
>
> > LSR Street Roadsters must have rear fenders that's a for-gone conclusion.
> > Don't believe its a topic that could be debated successfully or that you
> > will find much interest in making a change to remove the rear fenders from
> > the class.
> >
> > Generally speaking the majority of us racers aren't lawyers, so some times
> > the rules aren't as clear as we would all like them to be. And some times
> > because of history and tradition we assume more than is actually there.
> > Example, if you check the definition of 'panel' in the dictionary it in no
> > way describes a fender as any of us know it.
> >
> > My suggestion would be to ad the three words "rear fenders required"
> > somewhere in the 2002 rule book and eliminate the controversy. It will
> > definitely go into the ECTA book.
> >
> > John Beckett
///
/// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
/// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// with nothing in it but
///
/// unsubscribe land-speed
///
///
|