John, its all a mute point....tire manufacturers involved in
upper end racing have chips imbedded in the tire carcass
that ultimately sends data (supposedly just temp data) to
the pits from the vehicle on the course
and the reciever can do whatever he or she wants to with the data
data can go to and from the vehicle with telemetry.......
if everyone thinks its all too expensive, you may want to rethink it
the costs for tech. comes down almost exponentially
look whats sitting on old daily drivers in the junk yards
four lines of code, in an engine management system,
such as is currently done to ensure save engine operating
conditions, is alot cheaper than rebuilding a rolled streamliner
(and personal internal organs)
because the foot was at the incorrect frequency for the injectors
and ignition retard
Joe (hoping to see NEW frontiers of speed explored in my lifetime in any class,
by anyone not just Breadlove or Nobles) Amo
John Beckett wrote:
> "F-1 has found it impossible to enforce this rule."
>
> F-1 had a bunch of money to work with and invested in trying to enforce the
> ban on traction control. Might just be smarter for SCTA to ban specific
> parts like wheel sensors rather than trying to maintain a total ban on
> traction control which is un-enforceable.
>
> John Beckett
>
> > I think SCTA would be wise to make the traction control rule
> > match reality and delete all references to it.
> > There is NO way the rule can be enforced where engine management
> > systems are allowed.
> > That's the reality.
> >
> > Bryan Savage
///
/// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
/// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// with nothing in it but
///
/// unsubscribe land-speed
///
///
|