OK Jim, this may not be the most complementary or well worded statement ever
written on this list, but I would hardly call it bashing. The SCTA has been
around for over 50 years, not going away any time soon, and strong enough to
weather comments like this. Lets just use the delete key more frequently and
get back to aerodynamics, engines, bench racing and the fun part of LSR.
John Beckett
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Dincau" <jdincau@qnet.com>
To: "Dale" <Dale@prodigy.net>; <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: Maxton Motorcycle engine class question
> > Dale,
> > The E.C.T.A. recognizes that there are inherent differences between 2
> > cycle (the /2 class) and four cycle (/4 designation) engines. The other
> > sacntions either..... (a) don't know there are differences (which I don't
> > believe)..... (b) don't care........ or (c) just don't think it matters,
> > because they are really old school car guys (most likely).
>
> Boy am I getting tired of this SCTA bashing.
> The SCTA bike rules rules are made by bikers, there is an equal but seperate
> commitee and an annual meeting at speedweek.
> Jim
[This message delayed, as it needed manual intervention by the list
administrator. Just another person who has their mailer set to just
automatically include everything in the reply. mjb.]
///
/// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list
///
|