Being a newbie, I'm interested too ... even if it doesn't me directly (this
time).
Dale
-----Original Message-----
From: tim cunha [mailto:tfc1932@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 7:47 AM
To: kturk@ala.net; ddahlgren@snet.net; land-speed@autox.team.net;
leekenn@pacbell.net; dwarner@electrorent.com; mmanghel@hughes.net
Subject: Re: Rules/wankel engine size factor.........
i am with you keith and dave.
>From: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
>Reply-To: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
>To: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>, <land-speed@autox.team.net>,
>"Lee Kennedy" <leekenn@pacbell.net>, "Dan Warner"
><dwarner@electrorent.com>, "Mike Manghelli" <mmanghel@hughes.net>
>Subject: Re: Rules/wankel engine size factor.........
>Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 07:18:37 -0600
>
>Dave I really don't have a dog in this fight... But I would like to see
>some
>of the questions you posed answered....
>
>Like how do I change a Rule? What are the Procedures? Who do I contact?
>What do I have to Write? What Proof has to be Given of my claim?
>
>And in My humble opinion..... DO WE HAVE A VOICE?
>
>I think all concerned here agree that the whole Bonneville Experience is an
>Amatuer and Volunteer effort.... As such do the folks seeking records on
>the
>salt have a Voice? Can we submit and or seek changes to the rules... and
>if
>we do can we expect a fair and honest appraisal of our words? I think it's
>important to the health of our sport...
>
>Keith Turk
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Dave Dahlgren" <ddahlgren@snet.net>
>To: <land-speed@autox.team.net>; "Lee Kennedy" <leekenn@pacbell.net>; "Dan
>Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; "Mike Cook" <beauty1@hughes.net>; "Mike
>Manghelli" <mmanghel@hughes.net>
>Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 7:06 AM
>Subject: Re: Rules/wankel engine size factor.........
>
>
> > To all that might be interested...
> > It's been over 24 hrs... Not a word although 178 previous
> > e-mails on the subject not counting the ones i wrote.... Not
> > even a public show of hands from people here that are in
> > support, against and or think this needs to be addressed..
> > message received.. I have my own theories as to why it is so
> > quiet on this subject, but in general for peace and harmony
> > and good will to all i think the wise thing to do is just
> > keep them to myself. everybody have a good day, stand tall
> > if you can and if you can't, avoid mirrors as they never
> > lie.
> > Dave Dahlgren (where it is 8:00 am EST)
> >
> >
> > Dave Dahlgren wrote:
> > >
> > > It has been said that there is a rules meeting in Jan. What
> > > do I have to do to bring up a rules change for the
> > > Wankel(aka rotary) engine size factor for serious
> > > discussion? It has been e-mailed to death all over this
> > > group and to many individuals with all sorts of information
> > > to support it. can this be done via e-mail? if so to whom? i
> > > honestly think that waiting another year is a complete
> > > dis-service to the members of the LSR community that are
> > > interested or might consider building a car that uses on of
> > > these cheap and readily available power plants.
> > >
> > > So how is it done?
> > > Can it be done?
> > > Can it be done by phone or fax or e-mail?
> > > Is there any interest in changing this rule?
> > > Is there any information lacking that has not been passed
> > > around on the net?
> > > Does anyone that makes the rules have any questions at all
> > > or is there any info that I have left out in all the
> > > e-mails?
> > > Out of the people that have been included in this e-mail is
> > > anyone that helps make these decisions been left out?
> > > If so how are they contacted?
> > >
> > > I am hoping for a free exchange of ideas on this subject
> > > with some honest thought involved that is based on facts not
> > > history and personal feelings. I personally find it very
> > > hard to believe that FIA and SCCA is all screwed up in their
> > > use of engine factors of 2.1......... They have very good
> > > engineers that work on these subjects on a regular basis and
> > > represent both national and inter-national competition.
> > >
> > > If the answers to the above questions are no there is no
> > > interest and there is no desire to change anything or even
> > > consider any change for the benefit of the LSR community or
> > > to align SCTA with the rest of the world, please do me a
> > > small favor, actually two small favors.
> > > First is let that feeling be known publicly on the net at
> > > this e-mail group accompanied with the reasons why it can
> > > not or will not be changed along with the facts that made
> > > this decision the correct one.
> > >
> > > The other favor is small but personal, please leave off any
> > > personal attacks. I am not up to another tirade of being
> > > called a "Hot Shot wanna-be engineer" or sending out a bunch
> > > of crap! I do at times find great humor in it though when i
> > > watch Speedvision and ESPN and cars that I have supplied
> > > parts, done design work or personally tuned are very busy
> > > winning.....
> > >
> > > Dave Dahlgren
_________________________________________________________________
|