To: | land-speed@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Fwd: New Category |
From: | V4GR@aol.com |
Date: | Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:45:39 EDT |
--part1_30.6701415.267910b3_boundary --part1_30.6701415.267910b3_boundary Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: <V4GR@aol.com> From: V4GR@aol.com Full-name: V4GR Message-ID: <1e.68d1869.26791077@aol.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:44:39 EDT Subject: Re: New Category To: dwarner@electrorent.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 81 Dan; Yes Kugel, Macdoland, and a few others would be changed out of the altered class I'm in. It would seem that Larry Climbie's GTO would be a car that would benefit from this new class. But in truth his car would still be giving away to much to Camaros and Firebirds just as it is now. So what's the harm in having a bunch of new classes. Nothing I guess. I do think the no crank trigger has no reasoning behind it. What do you see as a benefit for the membership by ruling against crank trigger ignitions? Rich Fox --part1_30.6701415.267910b3_boundary-- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: NO EFI or crank fired ignition ?, Wester S Potter |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Fwd: New Category, Joe Amo |
Previous by Thread: | Re: New Category, Dan Warner |
Next by Thread: | Re: Fwd: New Category, Joe Amo |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |