land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Dyno hp

To: "Dick J" <lsr_man@yahoo.com>, <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Dyno hp
From: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 11:31:55 -0500
Okay for the purposes of clarification... we basically have 3 motors...

1.  the one we ran last weekend we call a D+  357 cubic inch 350 ... 3.48
crank and a 4.040 bore.... 6" Crower billet steel rods and Brownfield
Heads...

2. The D motor we ran on the salt last year... 296 cubic inch 302   2.90
stroke crank with (for now) 5.7 inch Aluminum Rods and Hogan Ported 292 Cast
Iron Heads

3. the New D motor ( sans Block Pistons and Rods at Present ) 2.80 crank and
18 degree Nascar Heads... Jesel Shaft mounted Rockers...

So Currently we have one running motor the D+ ( C for those who are
confused)  and the Bville D motor is about to go back together... got to
order some Pistons and Push Rods... oh and exhaust valves  .... Just got the
new Jesel Belt drive for it .... the Heads are back from getting the cast
iron repair.

Hmmm yep that about covers it.... I think ....less we have dreamed up
something new that I don't know about yet.... K
----- Original Message -----
From: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
To: Keith Turk <kturk@ala.net>; <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: Dyno hp


> Keith, when you say "little motor" what size are
> you talking about?  What other sizes (classes)
> are you running?
>
> Dick J
>
> --- Keith Turk <kturk@ala.net> wrote:
> > well the little Motor made 451 hp at the rear
> > wheels at 6000 rpm and was
> > still going up until it picked up a miss it had
> > just off idle.... Kinda like
> > a plug was fouled... decided to give up the
> > attempt rather then the
> > motor.... we will go back when it's right and
> > try again.... it's an
> > interesting way to learn about the car and
> > motor combination....
> >
> > love the whole deal.... just a bit of a
> > learning curve to go through... what
> > I know for sure right now is what Hp the motor
> > had at 6000 rpm.... wish I
> > had the 7200 rpm on the dyno.... but that was
> > simply enough for right
> > now....
> >
> > Keith ( who still believes that things don't
> > get better with RPM )
> >
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>