land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Flathead question

To: land-speed@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Flathead question
From: ARDUNDOUG@aol.com
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 11:47:36 EST
In a message dated 02/21/2000 6:14:15 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
lsr_man@yahoo.com writes:

<< For years I thought that the 286 and 296
 configurations were the biggest you could go with
 a flathead, then this weekend, re-reading through
 last year's Bonneville program, I noticed that
 the Pappas/Stevens XF roadsster is running a 314
 flathead.  How'd they do that?  I though that
 would get into the water jacket.
  >>
Dick,
    No, 313 or 314ci ( 3 3/8" X 4 3/8") is very doable without hitting any 
water. In 1989 I ran that combination in the XXF/GL. One could even go to a 4 
1/2" stroke and stay "wet" as long as stock Ford rods were used, netting 
around 324 ci. Beyond 324ci things get a little "dicey" due to the fact that 
3 7/16" bore is past what most blocks will take, the wall thickness gets 
pretty thin, and the Flatty rod becomes the weak-point of the system. Using 
Cunningham-type rods in almost any length stroke requires grinding clearance 
notches in the bottom of the cylinders. I've run as long a stroke as 4 1/4" 
with Cunninghams and didn't hit water when I notched the cylinders. Whether 
the block would take much more notching without hitting water is another 
matter.
    Another factor is cam-to-connecting rod clearance with a combination long 
stroke (over 4 1/4"), Cunningham rods, and a larger base-circle cam. Kenny 
Kloth in SLC has had extensive experience in that field. Maybe Wester or one 
of the SLC guys could get a reading from him and post it for 
us..........Ardun Doug in CA 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>