To: | lsr_man@yahoo.com, ARDUNDOUG@aol.com, dhaller@techline.com, |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Rules |
From: | dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com |
Date: | Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:46:38 -0500 |
Hooray for you!!! Some of these discussions regarding rules get way out of hand. I agree that the rule book is in great health - let it be!! yeah right, and let the competitors interpretations be too !!!! the scta rule book is fine (and i like simple rules more than anyone here ) ****** "IF " ****** scta tech is willing to allow the competitors to interpret them in a safe,fair way - if the scta tech committee is not willing to allow interpretation - then the rule book is inadequate - you cant have both, simple rules cannot coexist without the ability to interpret them. doug @ black radon engineering |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|