| To: | lsr_man@yahoo.com, ARDUNDOUG@aol.com, dhaller@techline.com, | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Rules | 
| From: | dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com | 
| Date: | Thu, 20 Jan 2000 09:46:38 -0500 | 
| Hooray for you!!! Some of these discussions regarding rules get way out of hand. I agree that the rule book is in great health - let it be!! yeah right, and let the competitors interpretations be too !!!! the scta rule book is fine (and i like simple rules more than anyone here ) ****** "IF " ****** scta tech is willing to allow the competitors to interpret them in a safe,fair way - if the scta tech committee is not willing to allow interpretation - then the rule book is inadequate - you cant have both, simple rules cannot coexist without the ability to interpret them. doug @ black radon engineering | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||