To: | tom felts <tomfelts@earthlink.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective |
From: | Dave & Marlene <rusd@velocitus.net> |
Date: | Thu, 01 Jul 2004 07:38:49 -0600 |
Tom, You are probably right. Environment fits the definition of a religion. Dave Russell tom felts wrote: > Hey guys---as they say religion, politics, and environment do not > mix----expecially on the Healey list. You, as most of us, are passionate > about the world we live in-------just wonder if this is the place to > discuss it? Just my 2 cents. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Poor idle when hot, conclusion, ah1960bt7 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Canada Day, Rich C |
Previous by Thread: | Fw: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective, healeyolic |
Next by Thread: | Re: Senate AB2683 analysis - perspective, bn1 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |