To: | "Freese, Ken" <Ken.Freese@Aerojet.com>, healeys@autox.team.net |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Fender Mirrors - Flat or Convex? |
From: | John Miller <healeys@n4vu.com> |
Date: | Mon, 5 Apr 2004 13:24:28 -0500 |
On Monday, April 05, 2004 1:43 pm, Freese, Ken wrote: > No way. At that fender position, a convex image will be so small you won't > be able to judge if the car is at your rear bumper or farther back. Smaller, you bet. But given the choice between seeing it too small or not at all, I'll go for too small. YMMV. -- John Miller, wore out the T-shirt A light wife doth make a heavy husband. -Wm. Shakespeare, "The Merchant of Venice" |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: healey nomenclature, ie. 100/4 ( pet peeve ), Rick Neville |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Fender Mirrors - Flat or Convex?, Awgertoo |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Fender Mirrors - Flat or Convex?, Dave & Marlene |
Next by Thread: | Re: Fender Mirrors - Flat or Convex?, Awgertoo |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |