To: | <fot@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | [Fot] Engine Vacuum System --SCCA |
From: | Rich Rock <rikrock@live.com> |
Date: | Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:55:55 -0400 FILETIME=[39D82870:01CD06E4] |
Delivered-to: | fot-archive@autox.team.net |
Delivered-to: | fot@autox.team.net |
List-archive: | <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot> |
List-help: | <mailto:fot-request@autox.team.net?subject=help> |
List-id: | Friends of Triumph <fot.autox.team.net> |
List-post: | <mailto:fot@autox.team.net> |
List-subscribe: | <http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot>, <mailto:fot-request@autox.team.net?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot>, <mailto:fot-request@autox.team.net?subject=unsubscribe> |
Finally got an answer from SCCA to the question----why are engine vacuum systems which connect to the exhaust system prohibited by SCCA? I didn't present an argument in favor of the system in my original letter, but I did say that I have seen them in use in cars raced in other series. The official response is printed in the April issue of FasTrack which came out today. It reads, in its entirety, as follows: "Thank you for your request. There is no need shown for these systems and they create a safety issue if they malfunction". Does anyone think we can win this "argument"? Rich Rock _______________________________________________ fot@autox.team.net http://www.fot-racing.com Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Forums: http://www.team.net/forums Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/fot-archive@autox.team.net |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Fot] Membership, need a second, Bobby Whitehead |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Fot] Engine Vacuum System --SCCA, Spitfire Racing |
Previous by Thread: | [Fot] Ed Dunn message, william r tobin |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Fot] Engine Vacuum System --SCCA, Spitfire Racing |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |