To comment this.
At the European tracks the flags are good visible (okay - except black
flag).
The corner workers are close to the track and they have lots of flags to
show.
I only know of one incident of overtaking at yellow since 2004 in our group.
-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: fot-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:fot-bounces@autox.team.net] Im
Auftrag von RACER BUD
Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. September 2008 05:40
An: Joe Curry; fubog1@aol.com; kaskas@cox.net; spyderweb@uwalumni.com;
fot@autox.team.net
Betreff: Re: [Fot] The Hamilton Case
Hello Gang...I tried to send this message directly but it bounced back a =
couple of times....
In Vintage Racing...In Essence...1. There are Waaay too many incidents of =
passing/not seeing the yellow flag.....
2. There are Way too many Vintage race drivers who appear to be very much =
out of condition physically...
How do they get their license/medical card?.....
We have argued for many years that We(Race Drivers) are Athletes..we Are =
Athletes!...We need to be FIT Athletes.....or....Not Race!
Racer Bud ..Racing since 1968
----- Original Message ----- =
From: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
To: <fubog1@aol.com>; <kaskas@cox.net>; <spyderweb@uwalumni.com>; =
<fot@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Fot] The Hamilton Case
> For What it's worth, over 2/3 of the peopled polled on the Official F1 Web
> site think that the appeal will not be successful.
>
> Joe C.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fubog1@aol.com [mailto:fubog1@aol.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:55 PM
> To: kaskas@cox.net; spitlist@cox.net; spyderweb@uwalumni.com;
> fot@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: [Fot] The Hamilton Case
>
> Well they spent over 5 hours in the kangaroo court today, on their way
> to Singapore.
> We'll know tomorrow. If it stands, it's sure going to make a lot of
> people look stupid...
> Glen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kas Kastner <kaskas@cox.net>
> To: Joe Curry <spitlist@cox.net>; spyderweb@uwalumni.com; 'Friends of
> Triumph' <fot@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 4:37 pm
> Subject: Re: [Fot] The Hamilton Case
>
> If the decision stands it will certainly put Charlie Whiting ( a good
> guy)
> in a very bad light having already okayed the pass.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
> To: <spyderweb@uwalumni.com>; "'Friends of Triumph'"
> <fot@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [Fot] The Hamilton Case
>
>
>> No money on it, but I predict that the decision will stand.
>>
>> Joe C.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: fot-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:fot-bounces@autox.team.net]
> On
>> Behalf Of spyderweb@uwalumni.com
>> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 11:13 PM
>> To: 'Friends of Triumph'
>> Subject: [Fot] The Hamilton Case
>>
>>
>>
>> Well Ladies and Gents, today is the day of the Hamilton/McLaren appeal
>> hearing, with the decision to be announced on Tuesday.
>>
>> Time to get your bets down on the outcome.
>>
>> A few hints for the sophisticated punter:
>>
>> ~ Since the initial decision and the following uproar, the F.I.A.
>> has issued a "clarification" of the rules, to the effect that:
>> "Drivers have to wait until the next corner to overtake if they go
>> ahead over a chicane." Does everyone remember the meaning of the Latin
>> term "ex post facto"?
>>
>> ~ Sir Stirling has issued a statement to the effect that the
>> decision to penalize Hamilton was "disgraceful" and "a load of crap",
>> made by "clueless" stewards who "know they are wrong".
>>
> [http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/more-sport/2008/09/22/stirling-slams-lewis
> -sp
>> a-treatment-115875-20747707/]
>>
>> ~ Asked for comment on the dispute and the upcoming hearing, FIA
>> president Max Mosley said, "My immediate reaction was this [situation]
>> is going to waste a great deal of everybody's time."
>>
> [http://www.crash.net/motorsport/f1/news/168911-0/bias_claims_rubbished_b
> y_m
>> osley.html]
>>
>> ~ And don't forget that (allegedly) the race director twice
>> advised McLaren by radio immediately after the incident that
>> Hamilton's actions were proper and sufficient.
>> ____________________________________
>>
>> Wagers anyone? Keep in mind that the issue is how the APPEAL will come
>> out -- NOT whether Hamilton's actions were proper under the rules
>> (since the answer to that question is intuitively obvious to even the
>> most casual observer :-)
>>
>> Jim Hill
>> Madison WI
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://www.team.net/donate.html
>>
>> Fot mailing list
>> Fot@autox.team.net
>> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://www.team.net/donate.html
>>
>> Fot mailing list
>> Fot@autox.team.net
>> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> Fot mailing list
> Fot@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.team.net/donate.html
>
> Fot mailing list
> Fot@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
> =
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
http://www.fot-racing.com
Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
http://www.fot-racing.com
Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
|