fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] SPITFIRE IN MONTEREY HISTORICS

To: "'Don Couch'" <don@dcphotos.com>, <fot@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Fot] SPITFIRE IN MONTEREY HISTORICS
From: "Russ Moore" <rem9@frontiernet.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:41:34 -0400
......1147cc actually with a FC prefix engine. Most vintage groups don't
raise a serious stink whether an early (round tail)car has the FC 1147; the
FD or FE small crank 1296 or the FK large crank 1296 as long as the engine
size is represented properly when entering an event. 

Russ

-----Original Message-----
From: fot-bounces@autox.team.net [mailto:fot-bounces@autox.team.net] On
Behalf Of Don Couch
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:15 PM
To: fot@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: [Fot] SPITFIRE IN MONTEREY HISTORICS

Also, it would be an 1100cc not a 1300 if it
is a MK1... not that I'm being picky either :-)
Don


On Jul 17, 2008, at 1:00 PM, fot-request@autox.team.net wrote:

> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:50:12 -0500
> From: "Robert MacKenzie" <list@mackenzie.aero>
> Subject: Re: [Fot] SPITFIRE IN MONTEREY HISTORICS
> To: <fot@autox.team.net>
> Message-ID: <002a01c8e82d$2e7c0070$8b740150$@aero>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Just curious about something; is the year/commission number correct  
> for this
> car or is there a misprint on the entry list?
>
> If I remember correctly; Spitfire production began in '62 and a car  
> FC11029
> would be at least a '63. (Not nitpicking - just curious)
>
> BTW: I will be racing this weekend (Sat & Sun) in the SCCA SWDIV  
> Solo series
> #3 in Houston.  If anybody is in the area please come by Gulf  
> Greyhound Park
> to say Hello!
>
>
> Robert MacKenzie
> 79 Spitfire 1500 (Street)
> 62 Spitfire Mk1 (Race)
> Cedar Park, TX
Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
_______________________________________________
http://www.team.net/donate.html

Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>