hmm. you must be made of money.
I didn't build my car to have it collect
dust. It is too bad that politics is what put cars to the pasture, sounds no
different with SVRA. I built a car to the rules, and the rules changed. I
could build a SVRA compliant car and then the rules could change because you
are the MAN and since I am your b****, I will have to change. "that's racing"
is something the "pros" have to live with, that is why they are pro's.
Doesn't
look like I will be running SVRA anytime soon. Thanks for the input, I am
sure I will find some place to run the car, just have to look.
A simple NO,
your car is not eligible would have been fine and we could all go about our
day.
Sorry FOT, I don't typically respond in this fashion but the reference to
"the MAN" was a little much for me to ignore.
I am done with this. Thanks
----- Original Message ----
From: "JWoesvra@aol.com" <JWoesvra@aol.com>
To:
jaxonracing@yahoo.com; REK46@aol.com; fpspitfire@comcast.net;
fot@autox.team.net
Sent: Sunday, June 1, 2008 5:51:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Fot]
alternatives to the SCCA?
In a message dated 6/1/2008 3:24:53 P.M. Eastern
Daylight Time, jaxonracing@yahoo.com writes:
because of rules issues in the
SCCA and the limitations of some vintage groups,
Not to beat a dead horse,
but "that's racin'".
You do what the MAN says or you put it away.
When you
ARE THE MAN, you can make the rules. Otherwise you pays your money and takes
your chances.
What do they say about big dogs and porches?
Never changes.
Just the faces change.
Jack Woehrle...since 1963!
________________________________
Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch
"Cooking with Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.
_______________________________________________
http://www.team.net/donate.html
Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot
|