fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Fot] Intake Manifold Crossover

To: "Joe Boruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>, <fot@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [Fot] Intake Manifold Crossover
From: "Charly Mitchel" <charly@mitchelplumbing.com>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 07:51:21 -0700
Joe, I'm not sure what could be gained from blocking it off.
On my MGB, streetcar, when I ported and polished the manifold, I spent extra 
time cleaning the area around the crossover and down inside it.  The gain 
was incredible for such a minor task.
I would think the motor would benefit from the additional intake of the 
opposing carburetor.  On a MG the head only has 1 intake port to share 
between 2 cylinders and maybe it makes more sense to share 2 carbs also.
Just my thoughts.
Charly Mitchel
TR6 #44
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joe Boruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>
To: <fot@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2007 5:34 AM
Subject: [Fot] Intake Manifold Crossover


>I have been debating the merits of blocking off the cross over tube in my 
>TR4
> intake manifold.  I have read that the tubes create turbulance and should 
> be
> blocked off.  Reading it and practical application, however, are 2 
> different
> things.   I have also heard of some MG racers blocking them off, but that
> still does not make it right.  Have any of you Listers tried this?  Any 
> dyno
> testing to determine if it is worth while?
> Joe(B)
> _______________________________________________
> Fot mailing list
> Fot@autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot 
_______________________________________________
Fot mailing list
Fot@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/fot

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>