Last time I was at Hallett, we shared uncle jack's car. We both felt like
we got a full race weekend. In the Friday practice day we both got enough
practice time that we sat out the last session. My neck hurt after the
weekend from holding my head up in the race car - a very strong indication
of lots of track time (don't normally have that problem). Not a big
spectator event, but I had a great time. Definitely a possibility for a
more low key event. I'd certainly support that.
- Tony Drews
At 10:05 AM 10/5/2004, Henry Frye wrote:
>I think Hallet is a great idea. I have heard nothing but fantastic things
>about the event and the track. Also within reach of a bunch of FOT that
>can't make the eastern events.
>
>One helluva tow for me though... But if you tell me I'm going to get a ton
>of track time with my buddies I'll be there is a heartbeat!
>
>At 10:55 AM 10/05/2004 -0400, N197TR4@cs.com wrote:
>>Any one can propose an event.
>>
>>Hallet was on the table for awhile and I personally like that idea. There
>>is going to be a time when this will happen.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Any thoughts about choosing an event to bring our 'show' to where the
>>>schedule will allow us enough race groups to handle our numbers so each
>>>group has a safe number of cars on the track at once? How about more than
>>>five 15 minute sessions in the race weekend?
>>>
>>>It seems to me the Festival events are not where we are going to find this.
>>>
>>>Where do we want our annual "big" event to be? Festival type events with
>>>generally bigger race groups with less track time OR club events where we
>>>are truly the main event, get better scheduling and more track time?
>>>
>>>Come on, guys, speak up.
>>>
>>>No doubt 2005 is cast in stone, we are going to run the Mitty. But I for
>>>one would like to see the direction of our future events turn away from the
>>>big festival events. Am I in the minority here?
|