fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Triumph

To: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@gte.net>,
Subject: Re: Triumph
From: "michael cook" <mlcooknj@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:30:05 -0400
Triumph 10 sedan and wagon.

This was a pretty good little car.

It was a Triumph 10. That was official. T-10 and TR-10 were abbreviations used
by dealers, customers and, sometimes, by Standard-Triumph employees.

The last year for it here was 1960. We launched the Herald that year but
carried over the 10 wagon only for a year as a 1960 model. The 1960 wagon had
the Standard Pennant front end fender and grille mods but not the Pennant
interior changes.

Last time I saw a Triumph 10 wagon, it was the body only mounted on some
monster 4WD truck chassis, rolling down a freeway around San Jose about ten
years ago.

Mike Cook
----- Original Message -----
From: Joe Curry
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:31 AM
To: William G Rosenbach
Cc: Herald948@aol.com; rocky@tri.net; gasket.works@gte.net;
fot@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Triumph

I believe it was a Standard 10 everywhere except North America where it was
branded a Triumph 10 because standard means something different in the US
than it does in The UK.

Joe (C)



William G Rosenbach wrote:
>
> Wasn't that a T-10 and not a TR-10? Seems as though it was a Standard
> T-10 as well, maybe not. The rear axle was used in the Lotus 6 and early
> 7s, its replacement had a wider track.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>