fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Triumph

To: Herald948@aol.com
Subject: Re: Triumph
From: William G Rosenbach <wgrosenbach@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 22:19:49 -0600
Wasn't that a T-10 and not a TR-10? Seems as though it was a Standard
T-10 as well, maybe not. The rear axle was used in the Lotus 6 and early
7s, its replacement had a wider track.

Bill

On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 18:40:05 EDT Herald948@aol.com writes:
> In a message dated 8/20/2001 6:05:21 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
> rocky@tri.net 
> writes:
> 
> 
> > There already was a Triumph TR10 -- quite possibly the ugliest car 
> ever
> > produced under the Triumph Badge (although the Herald would give 
> it a run
> > for its money). Think Mini without any of the Mini's charm.
> > 
> 
> Them's fightin' words, boy! :-)
> 
> --Andy
> 
> Andrew Mace, Vice President, Member Services
>   and 10/Herald/Vitesse (Sports 6) Vehicle Consultant
> The Vintage Triumph Register <www.vtr.org>

________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today!  For your FREE software, visit:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>