fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The 'TWIN FLUX CYCLOTRON'

To: "michael l. cook" <mlcooknj@bellatlantic.net>
Subject: Re: The 'TWIN FLUX CYCLOTRON'
From: Bob Lang <LANG@isis.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 10:47:40 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, michael l. cook wrote:

> Andrew Mace wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Bill Babcock wrote:
> > 
> > > There's a simple way to ensure you don't have a problem with Y2K--don't 
>let
> > > the vehicle/computer/powerplant know that it's 2000. Hide them in the 
>garage
> > > over new years and just pretend it's always 1999.
> > 
> > That might work. On the other hand, one look in my barn and most folks
> > would realize I've been pretending for years that it's about 1970 (the
> > year of my 'youngest' Triumph).
> > 
> > --Andy
> 
> 
> Let's see - in 1970 Triumphs and most British cars were only about ten
> years out of date. Since they didn't change much in the next ten years,
> we could say that in 1999 they are 39 years out of date. Therefore the
> FOT crowd and TR fans in general won't have Y2K until 2039.

It's funny that you come up with 2039... there is another similar 
"roll-over date" problem (like Y2K) that will happen for certain 
computers in 2038...

So, somehow UNIX is involved here. WOW.

Once again we see why Triumph enthusiasts are so kewl.

> There's a good excuse for buying more parts.

Yah, that's the ticket!

...for my girlfriend. Morgan Fairchild, yah, that's it!

;-)

> Mike Cook

rml
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Lang                Room N42-140Q          | This space for rent.
Consultant              MIT Computer Services  |        
Voice: (617)253-7438    FAX: (617)258-9535     |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>