Thank you, Stan (Cheapshot) Chernoff - for the reminder - I have to add another
name to my
"Filters" list...
Gary (if driving one's Roadster were a requirement, I wouldn't be the only one
who isn't
allowed on the list) McCormick
San Jose, CA
Stan Chernoff wrote:
> Gary,
>
> It is not a violation if the vehicle is remanded to a garage and only
> talked about frequently.
>
> Stan
> =========
>
> At 04:27 PM 6/4/02 -0700, Gary K. McCormick wrote:
> >...and are thus violating NHTSA safety requirements. The reflectors were
> relocated because
> >they were made larger, and they were made larger to comply with new
> regulations which
> >increased the required reflective are at the rear of a vehicle. The
> larger, rectangular
> >side marker lamps on the '70 are part of the same deal.
> >
> >Gary McCormick
> >San Jose, CA
> >
> >Andrew Murphy wrote:
> >
> >> <snip>The 70 roadster had a much larger refelctor that was relocated to the
> >> side of the tail lights. A lot of people found the rear end way too busy
> >> because of this and removed them.<snip>
> >
> >/// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
> >/// Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or go to
> >/// http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
> >/// Send list postings to datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
>
> /// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
> /// Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or go to
> /// http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
> /// Send list postings to datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
/// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
|