Dave,
The 2000 has a larger bore diameter. The 1600 carbs will likely not flow
enough for your 2000 to rev to the outer limits - it will run out of breath.
They would probably work for a sedately driven street car, but why if you
have the right ones?
Sid
>From: "Dixon, Clifton, SSG, 134ARW, CP" <Clifton.Dixon@tnknox.ang.af.mil>
>Reply-To: "Dixon, Clifton, SSG, 134ARW, CP"
><Clifton.Dixon@tnknox.ang.af.mil>
>To: datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
>Subject: SU carbs 1600 v/s 2000
>Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 13:58:00 -0500
>
>Greetings all,
> I have a 1970 2000 and two sets of SU carbs: one set from a '68
>1600
>and the original set from my '70 2000. They look almost identical except
>the '70s are dome-shaped, and the '68s are flatter on top. The '70s may be
>a little larger, although I haven't compared them closely enough to say for
>sure.
> What's the difference, if any? What are the pros and cons of using
>either?
>
> Thanks! Dave Dixon Knoxville, TN
>
>/// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
>/// Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or go to
>/// http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
>/// Send list postings to datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
/// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
|