Guys and gals,
This is about fun. I do not see a problem with a 1600 wing or a 1500 wing
for that matter. The 2000s do seem to get more air time now, so it would
only be equal time. It is not a Secessionist movement to me.
Sid Raper
Jacksonville Composite Squadron
(I currently have one of each!)
>From: Robert.Long@CSDInc.com
>Reply-To: Robert.Long@CSDInc.com
>To: datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
>Subject: FW: Questions about restoration, and are 1600's the Red headed S
>tep-children?
>Date: Fri, 16 Jul 1999 14:42:11 -0600
>
>I gotta agree with Gary, but I sure would like an R16 "Fighter" Squadron
>shirt to rival those U20 "Bomber" shirts...
>
>Robert Long - 67.5 1600 - Albuquerque Fighter Wing
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Gary McCormick [mailto:svgkm@halley.ca.essd.northgrum.com]
>Sent: Friday, July 16, 1999 2:10 PM
>To: Datsun-Roadsters (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: Questions about restoration, and are 1600's the Red headed
>Step-children?
>
>
>Sounds like a Secessionist movement to me. Didn't we slap one of those
>down
>back in
>(18)63 or so? ;^ )
>
>
>"We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately."
> Benjamin Franklin, at the signing of the Declaration of
>Independence, July 4,
>1776
>
>Gary McCormick
>San Jose, CA
>-----------------------------------
>
>eric gilbert wrote:
>
> > i would be willing to start a 1600 sub list or club.
> >
> > i'm tired of reading the 2000 stuff. timing chain problems, etc.
> >
> > do you want to take the ball?
> >
> > i'll design something.
> >
> > and i'm not chopping the machine either. better original.
> >
> > eric
> > 67 1600
|