british-cars
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: TR3 resevour and accelelator

To: britcars@hpfckjs.fc.hp.com, british-cars@autox.team.net, british@apple.com,
Subject: Re: TR3 resevour and accelelator
From: "TeriAnn Wakeman" <twakeman@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 93 12:02:55 -0800
In message <9311221934.AA02108@hpfckjs.fc.hp.com>  writes:
> I spent some time digging through my parts bins and studing the different 
> cars I
> currently have (1954 TR2LD , 1955 TR2, 1956 TR3, and 1961 TR3A).
> 
> Here are my observations on the accelorator linkage and brake resevour 
> bottle.
> 
> The accelorator linkage on all of my parts and cars appear to have been 
> painted
> black at some time in the past.  Since some of these are most certanly in
> still origonal I suspect that the linkages and peddles were painted black.  
> 
> This is not the case with the TR4 and GT6's.  All of my TR4's and GT6's have
> unpainted linckages and peddles.
> 

Thanks my dreaded previous owner painted the engine compartment black.  Who 
knows what all got painted.  My confusion is the only paint I say on mine was 
silver on the driver's face of the peddle and original body colour on the 
mounting flanges facing the bulkhead.


> The resovour bottle on the 1961 TR3A is the only one I have but I believe it 
> is
> origonal. The car was sold in Cal. in 1962 and last licensed in Cal. in 1975 
> so
> I suspect that it is primarlilly origonal.
> 
> I took a careful look at the ZS carb set up on the TR3A also.  They are 
> mounted
> on the long tube intake manifolds.  I see 2 possiblities.  Based on the late
> manufacturing date of this vehicle (one of the last 1000) they may have used 
> the
> long manifold and ZS carbs.  Or the origonal owner had the carbs replaced 
> with
> TR4 used parts for some reason.  Since the car only has 89K miles on it, it
> doesn't seem likly that the carbs were replaced, unless there was an 
> emissions
> reason in Cal. to do this.
> 
> Were the emmissions restrictions in Cal. in the early 70's that replacing
> slightly worn carbs with less slightly worn carbs would have been a benefit?
> 

There are no SMOG rules in California that a '61 would need to meet.  I have 
seen a number of 3Bs with SUs & TR4s with SUs.  People seem to blame SUs for 
everything from a engine that wont start to rashes.  I'm still betting that the 
previous owner replaced the carbs.  Since they are ZS carbs, I bet it was done 
by a garage that went to the Triumph dealer in the mid to late 60s and bought 
what was available from the dealer.


> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                               
> Kevin Spooner                                  
> The Sports Works of Greeley
> Specializing in Triumphs and British Sports Cars                              
>     
> britcars@hpfckjs.fc.hp.com                            
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------


Thanks for looking.  I'll get back to you on the breather pipe.  I want to make 
one last look first.


Take care,


TeriAnn




TeriAnn Wakeman             One of these days, I'll be old enough that
twakeman@apple.com          people will stop calling me crazy and start
LINK: TWAKEMAN              calling me eccentric.
408-974-2344        TR3A - TS75519L, MGBGT - GHD4U149572G, 109 - 164000561



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>