british-cars
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Moving violations, was re:....

To: whs70@dancer.cc.bellcore.com
Subject: Re: Moving violations, was re:....
From: Roland Dudley <cobra@cdc.hp.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 92 12:33:20 pdt
> From: whs70@dancer.cc.bellcore.com (sohl,william h)
> To: cobra@snakebyte.cdc.hp.com
> Date: 25 Aug 1992  15:23 EDT
> Subject: Moving violations, was re:....
> 
> 
> Well, at least in NJ, a moving violation is only one in which you
> actually do something wrong in th e process of driving the vehicle
> in violation of some "moving" law (eg. speeding, illegal turns, 
> reckless driving, etc.)  Other things, defective headlight,
> uninspected vehicle, improper credentials, etc are not considered
> moving violations, regardless of if the car was in motion.

As everyone is well aware, California has an exceptionally gifted group
of state lawmakers.  I'm completely confident that they have come up
with the best possible definition of what constitutes a moving violation.

Roland


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>