Now if we had the size of Topeka, with concrete like Mather and the
elevation changes of San Diego, it'd be pretty cool...
Jim
At 03:57 PM 11/15/2002 -0800, Pat Kelly wrote:
>The best would duplicate Topeka, broken concrete slabs and the grade. :) At
>least until a new Topeka site is built. Then we'd have to change to asphalt,
>smooth, and maybe a little gradient.
>--Pat K
>
>----------
> >From: "Kirk Meline" <kirkm@zeta-idt.com>
> >To: <CMerritt@luminous.com>, <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
> >Subject: RE: New site
> >Date: Fri, Nov 15, 2002, 3:55 PM
> >
>
> > Carl
> >
> > We already have Candlestick to play on. Can you imagine the money it would
> > take to duplicate that kind of action?
> >
> > Kirk
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net
> > [mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of CMerritt@luminous.com
> > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 3:32 PM
> > To: ba-autox@autox.team.net
> > Subject: RE: New site
> >
> >
> > Unrelated food for thought:
> >
> > Is the 'best' chunk of Autocross pavement table-top flat or does it have
> > some sort of elevation changes for course designers to play with?
> >
> > -Carl
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kirk Meline [mailto:kirkm@zeta-idt.com]
> > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:08 PM
> > To: Ba-Autox
> > Subject: New site
> >
> >
> > This is an update on a potential new site. I have located a land owner
> that
> > is leasing out land in the far South Bay. The land owners will be
> > discussing our interest and getting back to me hopefully later this
> week. I
> > would like to get more people involved at the steering committee on Tuesday
> > so that we can start work on this project. Even if it doesn't happen we
> > should be prepared to move on any new site. This is exciting to even think
> > of developing our own long term site. Please show up to the steering
> > committee meeting if you have anything to add or can help with.
> >
> >
> > Kirk
|